ArticleBayesian analysis2024
Coarsened Mixtures of Hierarchical Skew Normal Kernels for Flow and Mass Cytometry Analyses.
Article in Bayesian analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Tree Perspective on Stick-Breaking Models in Covariate-Dependent Mixtures (with Discussion).Bayesian analysis · 2025Article
- Bayesian Clustering via Fusing of Localized Densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025Article
- Coarsened Mixtures of Hierarchical Skew Normal Kernels for Flow and Mass Cytometry Analyses.Bayesian analysis · 2024Article
- A generalized Bayes framework for probabilistic clustering.Biometrika · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytometry is the standard multi-parameter assay for measuring single cell phenotype and functionality. It is commonly used for quantifying the relative frequencies of cell subsets in blood and disaggregated tissues. A typical analysis of cytometry data involves cell classification-that is, the identification of cell subgroups in the sample-and comparisons of the cell subgroups across samples or conditions. While modern experiments often necessitate the collection and processing of samples in multiple batches, analysis of cytometry data across batches is challenging because differences across samples may occur due to either true biological variation or technical reasons such as antibody lot effects or instrument optics across batches. Thus a critical step in comparative analyses of multi-sample cytometry data-yet missing in existing automated methods for analyzing such data-is cross-sample calibration, whose goal is to align corresponding cell subsets across multiple samples in the presence of technical variations, so that biological variations can be meaningfully compared. We introduce a Bayesian nonparametric hierarchical modeling approach for accomplishing both calibration and cell classification simultaneously in a unified probabilistic manner. Three important features of our method make it particularly effective for analyzing multi-sample cytometry data: a nonparametric mixture avoids prespecifying the number of cell clusters; a hierarchical skew normal kernel that allows flexibility in the shapes of the cell subsets and cross-sample variation in their locations; and finally the "coarsening" strategy makes inference robust to departures from the model not captured by the skew normal kernels. We demonstrate the merits of our approach in simulated examples and carry out a case study in the analysis of a multi-sample cytometry data set. We provide an R package for our method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.