ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2026
Patient-specific 3D-printed perforator mapping guide for propeller flap reconstruction in the hand.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of hand soft tissue defects relies on accurate perforator localization, yet conventional planning with computed tomography angiography or handheld Doppler requires mental three-dimensional (3D) translation, and is associated with mapping errors or intraoperative adjustments. This article evaluates the use of an innovative patient-specific, surface-conforming 3D-printed guides that convert segmented preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data into tangible templates to project dorsal metacarpal artery (DMA) perforator emergence points onto the skin with reproducible accuracy. In an illustrative case, a 66-year-old man underwent wide local excision of a digital porocarcinoma followed by propeller flap reconstruction. The third and fourth DMA perforators were identified from MRI, with a 2 mm-thick dorsal hand shell designed with 1 cm fenestrations corresponding to perforator emergence points. The perforators were marked onto the skin through the custom guide preoperatively, with skin markings cross verified with handheld Doppler. Reconstruction proceeded using a fourth DMA perforator-based propeller flap rotated to achieve tension-free coverage, with complete flap survival and restoration of full digital motion and satisfactory aesthetics. The 3D-printed guide reduced cognitive load, accelerated perforator localization, and minimized unnecessary dissection, supporting shorter tourniquet duration and safer elevation. The hand's distinct bony landmarks and stable contours enable reliable registration of rigid surface guides. As costs and workflows for imaging-to-print continue to decrease, patient-specific 3D-printed guides represent a practical, scalable adjunct that improved accuracy, efficiency, and reproducibility in perforator-based hand reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.