ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
U-Net-based reactive center loop-identifier for serpins.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Serine protease inhibitors (serpins) are a large family of proteins conserved in all animals. A prominent enigma about serpins is that, while members of this family share an archetypal folding scheme, individual proteins have diverse functions and are involved in a variety of biological processes, including controlling inflammation, maintaining hormone homeostasis, and regulating osteogenesis. The reactive center loop (RCL) region plays a crucial role in determining the functional specificity of serpins. Yet, of the >48 000 serpins recorded in the UniProt database, only 78 have the RCL annotated. This is because the RCL, due to its high variability, cannot be identified using standard motif-matrix-based annotation strategies. Results: To overcome this deficiency, we tested neural network-based approaches for automatic RCL annotation. Using an expert-annotated training/validation dataset, we tested combinations of encodings and model architectures. U-Net-based models stood out as the best approach for this task. On the independent test dataset, U-Net-based models achieved ∼98% accuracy in identifying the RCL at the per-sequence level. Availability and implementation: Source code, training and testing datasets, and models are freely available at https://github.com/leizhou69/RCL-identifier or https://github.com/JasonLiang19/RCL-identifier under the MIT license.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.