ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Clinical Outcomes of 1.5-Stage Arthroplasty for Native Joint Septic Arthritis of the Hip and Knee: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) requires joint excision and arthroplasty when debridement fails or irreversible joint damage is present. Traditionally, this is performed as a staged procedure with a spacer and antibiotics prior to definitive arthroplasty. While effective, this approach is associated with multiple operations, prolonged treatment, and increased morbidity. The 1.5-stage arthroplasty has recently emerged as a potential alternative in treating periprosthetic joint infections, but its role in NJSA remains unexplored. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of 1.5-stage arthroplasties in hips and knees for NJSA. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent a 1.5-stage (n = 45) arthroplasty for NJSA between 2015 and 2024. Primary outcome was the revision rate at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included surgical complication rates, length of hospital stay, rate of progression to second stage, 30-day emergency department and hospital readmission rates, and 1-year mortality. Results: At 1 year, the revision rate was 26.7%, with only 2 revisions performed for surgical complications (6.7%). Overall, 24.4% of patients progressed to a planned second stage within 1 year, primarily for functional optimization. The median length of stay was 13.5 days (interquartile range: 8-16). Thirty-day emergency department presentations (11.1%), readmissions (6.7%), and 1-year mortality (4.4%) were low and did not differ between hip and knee cohorts. No baseline demographic or clinical factors were significantly associated with revision risk. Conclusions: These findings suggest that 1.5-stage arthroplasty is a safe and effective option for NJSA, potentially avoiding additional surgery in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.