ArticleBrain & spine2026
Systematic anatomical validation of the endoscopic mononostril transethmoid-paraseptal approach to the central skull base.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The endoscopic transsphenoidal approach is the standard technique to remove central skull base lesions; however, binostril modifications often require extensive intranasal dissection resulting in sinonasal morbidity. Research question: The transethmoid-paraseptal approach (TPA) is a mononostril alternative designed to preserve sinonasal function while maintaining adequate surgical exposure. Its systematic anatomical and radiological validation is lacking. Materials and methods: The TPA was performed on 19 cadaveric specimens to identify anatomical landmarks and assess reproducibility. Based on the dissections, a surgical checklist was developed. Cone-beam CT scans of 43 patients and 9 further cadaveric heads (total: 104 sides) were analyzed using the 3D-Slicer software to identify anatomical variants influencing the approach. Results: The TPA corridor was successfully established in all cadaveric cases. Consistent identification of key landmarks-e.g. uncinate process, ethmoid bulla, sphenoid rostrum, and sphenoid sinus-was achieved in 100% of specimens, except for one undeveloped ethmoid bulla. Relevant anatomical variants included: fusion of the ethmoid bulla with the basal lamella of the middle turbinate (62.6%), nasal septal deviation (36.6%), posterosuperior ethmoid (Ónodi-) cell (12.2%), conchal type sphenoid sinus (2.8%), maxillary sinus hypoplasia (0.8%). All variants were detectable on preoperative imaging and did not preclude the approach. A conversion to binostril surgery was not required. Discussion and conclusion: The TPA is a reproducible, anatomically reliable mononostril corridor to the central skull base. Preoperative CT analysis allows identification of anatomical variants that may influence surgical orientation. Further clinical studies are required to compare the surgical outcomes and different transnasal techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.