ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and diagnostic properties of the Arabic version of self-diagnosis questionnaire for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) is a common peripheral vestibular disorder, yet no validated Arabic BPPV-specific questionnaire is currently available. To translate and culturally adapt the self-diagnosis BPPV questionnaire into Arabic and to evaluate its psychometric and diagnostic properties. Following cross-cultural adaptation in accordance with established guidelines, 88 participants completed the Arabic version of the questionnaire. Psychometric and diagnostic properties were evaluated. Content validity was excellent (item-level indices ranging from 0.94 to 1.00 for both clarity and relevance, and a scale-level index of 0.98). Convergent validity demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement with positional test results (Cohen's κ values reaching 0.69). Known-groups validity showed fair to excellent discriminative ability (area under the curve values up to 0.84). Internal consistency was moderate for the screening questions (Cronbach's α = 0.720) but lower for subtype determination questions (Cronbach's α = 0.532). The screening component correctly classified (81.8%) participants, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, PLR, and NLR of 87.2%, 75.6%, 80.4%, 83.8%, 3.58, and 0.17, respectively. Agreement for the affected ear and BPPV subtype was limited, with many undetermined cases. The Arabic self-diagnosis BPPV questionnaire demonstrated strong content validity, acceptable construct validity, and good diagnostic performance for screening BPPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.