ArticleFrontiers in neurology
24-h NIHSS score is the strongest prognostic predictor of 90-day outcome in cardioembolic stroke patients with anterior circulation occlusion after endovascular thrombectomy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) assessed at baseline, at 24 h, and derived change metrics for 90-day unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3-6) in cardioembolic stroke patients with Anterior Circulation Occlusion (ACO) post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 103 eligible patients was performed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and DeLong's test compared the predictive performance of baseline NIHSS, 24-h NIHSS, ΔNIHSS (baseline NIHSS - 24-h NIHSS) and the percent ΔNIHSS (ΔNIHSS × 100/baseline NIHSS). Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed 24-h NIHSS, baseline NIHSS, ΔNIHSS, and percent ΔNIHSS as independent predictors. ROC analysis showed that 24-h NIHSS had the highest predictive power (AUC = 0.850), significantly outperforming baseline NIHSS (AUC = 0.702), ΔNIHSS (AUC = 0.735), and percent ΔNIHSS (AUC = 0.780). The optimal cut-off value was ≥12, with 82.2% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity. Combining 24-h NIHSS with other NIHSS-based metrics did not improve predictive performance compared to 24-h NIHSS alone. Conclusion: The 24-h NIHSS score is the strongest prognostic predictor of 90-day unfavorable functional outcome in cardioembolic stroke patients post-EVT, superior to baseline scores, ΔNIHSS and percent ΔNIHSS. It serves as an early and effective tool for prognostic stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.