Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

An idiographic network approach to modeling daily loneliness and paranoia in psychosis: implications for personalized interventions.

Jakub Januška, Daniel Dančík, Michal Hajdúk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakub JanuškaDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Daniel DančíkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Michal HajdúkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The call for personalized approaches in psychopathology is growing, as group-level analyses fail to capture the person-specific patterns. This study used an idiographic network approach to model the daily dynamics of loneliness, paranoia, affect, and social motivation in seven individuals with psychosis. We applied Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME) to intensive longitudinal data collected using the Experience sampling method. Results revealed substantial inter-individual heterogeneity, particularly in social motivation pathways and the role of paranoia in affective changes. Specifically, the relationship between social avoidance and approach was positive for one participant and negative for another. Furthermore, a unique temporal effect of paranoia predicting subsequent negative affect was identified in one case. These findings highlight the critical relevance of idiographic methods for moving beyond generalized models and identifying precise, actionable targets for developing tailored interventions in psychosis.

Indexed as

experience sampling methodidiographic approachlonelinessnetwork analysisparanoia

Identifiers

PMID42211185
PMCPMC13212484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.