ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
An LLM-based methodology for the automatic detection of bias in the DuoWikiBias corpus.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bias detection remains a challenge in Natural Language Processing, particularly in non-English contexts, due to the conceptual ambiguity of bias and the scarcity of annotated resources. This study addresses the lack of Spanish-language resources by investigating the automatic detection of framing, epistemological, and demographic biases. We introduce DuoWikiBias, a novel parallel corpus derived from Wikipedia for Spanish bias classification. We evaluate Large Language Models (Llama and Gemma) using advanced prompting techniques-CARP and Metacognition-combined with a Gradient Ascent unlearning method to refine model attention. Their performance is compared against classical approaches, including logistic regression with S-BERT embeddings and linguistic features. Results show that advanced prompting substantially improves performance over simple instructions, while the best overall performance (F1 = 0.796) is achieved by combining CARP-based features with Gradient Ascent and a Support Vector Machine classifier. These findings suggest that LLMs are effective for bias-aware representation learning, but hybrid approaches with traditional classifiers remain competitive. This work provides both a validated dataset and a methodological framework for bias detection in Spanish NLP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.