Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211134›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Dissociation in cross-feature integration between behavioral and pupil dilation responses in auditory deviant detection.

Nahaleh Fatemi, Hsin-I Liao, Mounya Elhilali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nahaleh FatemiElectrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hsin-I LiaoNTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT, Inc., Atsugi, Japan.
Mounya ElhilaliElectrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of deviant events in complex soundscapes requires tracking fluctuations across multiple acoustic features such as pitch, timbre, and loudness. While both behavioral measures and pupil dilation responses (PDR) are sensitive to individual feature changes, it remains unclear how these cues are integrated in complex acoustic scenes. We examined cross-feature interactions underlying auditory deviance using a deviant-detection task and PDR recordings as participants listened to dynamic soundscapes with deviant events. Using the Dynamic Regularity Extraction (D-REX) model, we quantified feature-specific and integrated surprisal to relate stimulus structure to observed responses. Constrained regression analyses showed that behavioral responses exhibited clear cross-feature integration, whereas PDRs were better explained by feature-specific surprisal with limited evidence of cross-feature interactions. These findings highlight a dissociation between physiological and behavioral responses and provide a framework for comparing how different response modalities relate to the acoustic structure of auditory scenes.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceNeuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42211134
PMCPMC13214528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.