ArticleiScience2026
Dissociation in cross-feature integration between behavioral and pupil dilation responses in auditory deviant detection.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of deviant events in complex soundscapes requires tracking fluctuations across multiple acoustic features such as pitch, timbre, and loudness. While both behavioral measures and pupil dilation responses (PDR) are sensitive to individual feature changes, it remains unclear how these cues are integrated in complex acoustic scenes. We examined cross-feature interactions underlying auditory deviance using a deviant-detection task and PDR recordings as participants listened to dynamic soundscapes with deviant events. Using the Dynamic Regularity Extraction (D-REX) model, we quantified feature-specific and integrated surprisal to relate stimulus structure to observed responses. Constrained regression analyses showed that behavioral responses exhibited clear cross-feature integration, whereas PDRs were better explained by feature-specific surprisal with limited evidence of cross-feature interactions. These findings highlight a dissociation between physiological and behavioral responses and provide a framework for comparing how different response modalities relate to the acoustic structure of auditory scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.