ArticleiScience2026
LRF-CNN: An explainable lightweight receptive field-based CNN for colorectal cancer histopathological image classification.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and diagnosis rely on histopathological assessment, but many high-performing deep learning (DL) models remain computationally demanding and difficult to interpret. This study presents an explainable lightweight receptive field-based convolutional neural network (LRF-CNN) for colorectal histopathological image classification. LRF-CNN integrates multi-branch lightweight receptive field-based (LRF) blocks with an attention block, together with post hoc activation quantification and multi-stage feature-map visualization to improve explainability. On a public five-class colorectal histopathological image dataset, LRF-CNN achieved 92.09% accuracy and outperformed 26 comparative models. The model also showed strong performance on gastric histopathology classification, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status prediction in esophageal cancer, and an additional colorectal dataset, with robustness supported by external validation under domain shift. These findings support the LRF-CNN model as an accurate, efficient, and explainable tool for digital pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.