ArticleiScience2026
Trial-by-trial covariation of pupil dilation, microsaccades, and visual evoked potentials during saliency processing.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salient stimuli evoke multiple orienting responses, including microsaccades, pupil dilation, and visually evoked potentials (VEPs); yet, these signals are typically studied in isolation, leaving unclear whether they covary systematically during visual orienting. We simultaneously recorded eye movements, pupil size, and EEG while participants performed a visual discrimination task with varying stimulus contrast. High-contrast stimuli elicited larger pupil dilation, smaller microsaccade amplitudes, and greater P1 and N1 amplitudes than low-contrast stimuli. Trial-by-trial analyses revealed reliable intra-individual covariation among these measures: stronger microsaccade inhibition and smaller amplitudes were associated with larger pupil dilation and more negative N1 amplitudes, and stimulus-related pupil dilation covaried with P1 amplitude. Several orienting measures were also associated with reaction time, indicating behavioral relevance. In contrast, contrast-induced modulations did not correlate across individuals, suggesting that coordination primarily reflects within-individual trial-level variability. These findings demonstrate structured trial-by-trial covariation among cortical, oculomotor, and autonomic responses during visual orienting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.