ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Missed opportunities in nutritional care: prevalence, mortality, and resource utilization in internal medicine wards.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malnutrition is a highly prevalent and underdiagnosed condition among hospitalized patients, especially in internal medicine wards. Hospital malnutrition is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged admissions, and a substantial economic burden. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the clinical and economic impact of nutritional risk in patients admitted to internal medicine wards, focusing on mortality, hospital resource utilization, and the effectiveness of nutritional interventions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at ULS Santo António, Porto, including 1,150 hospital admissions from January to December 2022. All adult patients with nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002) in the first 48 h of admission were included. Data were collected from hospital information systems on demographic, clinical, and economic variables, with outcomes including in-hospital mortality, readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days, and one-year post-discharge mortality. Results: Nutritional risk (NRS-2002 ≥ 3) was identified in 42.4% of patients ( Conclusion: Nutritional risk affected 42.4% of internal medicine inpatients and was associated with higher mortality and resource use. The finding that 74.4% of at-risk patients received no nutritional intervention represents a substantial missed opportunity. Patients who received nutritional supplementation showed a pattern of lower mortality risk than unsupplemented at-risk patients, consistent with but not proving a beneficial association. These findings support systematic nutritional screening and timely intervention in hospital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.