ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2026
Early-career researchers in Chile: findings from a national survey on conditions, challenges, and institutional perceptions.
Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chile's investment in postgraduate training has produced a highly qualified cohort of early-career researchers. Yet little is known about how these researchers experience employment conditions, access to competitive funding, and the institutional environment in which they pursue their careers. Here, we report findings from a national survey of 267 early-career researchers working in Chile, examining training trajectories, employment conditions, grant-seeking experiences, time allocation, caregiving responsibilities, and perceptions of recent institutional reforms. Respondents reported high levels of intrinsic job satisfaction, particularly regarding intellectual challenge, autonomy, and the social value of their work. At the same time, they expressed concerns about contractual instability, workload intensity, and insufficient income. Nearly half held a second job, and those with caregiving responsibilities allocated less time to research. Care responsibilities were more frequently reported by women, who devoted substantially more time to caregiving than men. Participation in competitive funding programs varied across career stages, with higher application and success rates in entry-level schemes than in more advanced grant competitions. Gender differences were also observed in progression toward senior funding opportunities. Notably, a substantial proportion of unfunded proposals had received positive evaluations, suggesting that part of the country's research capacity remains unsupported despite being competitively viable. This reveals an unrealized scientific potential and a gap between Chile's expanding scientific base and the public investment available to sustain it. Although recent institutional reforms were perceived as contributing to greater diversity and regional participation, respondents identified limited improvements in overall funding levels and the international impact of Chilean research. These findings provide an empirical characterization of the working conditions and career challenges faced by early-career researchers in Chile, highlighting persistent structural barriers related to career consolidation, funding access, gender equity, and work-life balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.