ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026
Sexual and gender based violence in Nigeria tertiary institutions: exploring the roles of stakeholders and best practices.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (SGBV) remains a major global public health and human rights concern with profound implications for women's safety, dignity, and quality of life. In Nigeria, SGBV is pervasive, particularly within tertiary institutions, where young women and adolescent girls face heightened vulnerability. This study explored the roles of key stakeholders and identified best practices in addressing SGBV within Nigerian higher education institutions to inform effective policies and interventions. A cross-sectional, sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 4,142 participants across tertiary institutions in Kaduna, Enugu, Osun, and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) using multistage stratified random sampling. Qualitative data were obtained through 22 key informant interviews, 12 in-depth interviews, and 7 focus group discussions with relevant stakeholders. The study was anchored on the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) and the Theory of Change (ToC), which facilitated a multi-level analysis of influences and linked diagnostic insights to actionable intervention pathways. Quantitative data were analyzed with SPSS version 25, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti software. Findings indicated that most stakeholders addressing SGBV were non-state actors, including student associations (17.4%), parents (12.6%), academic staff (11.6%), and non-governmental organizations (13.5%). These groups were particularly active in Osun State (37.7%) and the FCT (18.3%). Qualitative findings corroborated these patterns, emphasizing the visible roles of NGOs and student-led organizations in awareness creation, advocacy, and survivor support. TFG, state actors such as the Ministry of Education (8.7%), law enforcement agencies (7.7%), the judiciary (4.8%), and institutional management (7.7%) were primarily recognized for policy formulation and enforcement, collectively accounting for 28.9% of total mentions. Although their formal authority was acknowledged, their operational presence within institutions appeared limited. Notably, effective collaborations observed in Osun and Abuja provided functional models of multi-stakeholder engagement and survivor-centered responses. The study concludes that SGBV prevention in Nigerian tertiary institutions is largely driven by non-state actors amid weak state engagement. Strengthening coordination, enforcing policies, and institutionalizing gender-responsive frameworks are critical to fostering sustainable, equitable, and violence-free campuses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.