Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211010›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2026

Residential mobility and receipt of measles, mumps and rubella vaccination: analysis of linked primary care electronic health records in a London region.

Nicola Firman, Laura North, Milena Marszalek, Marta Wilk, Ana Gutierrez, Rhodri Johnson, Carol Dezateux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Yonder.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicola FirmanCentre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB.
Laura NorthSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Sciences, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP.
Milena MarszalekCentre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB.
Marta WilkCentre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB.
Ana GutierrezCentre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB.
Rhodri JohnsonSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Sciences, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP.
Carol DezateuxCentre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residential mobility in early life may disrupt access to health care. We examined associations between residential mobility in the first two years of life and receipt of first measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination by 24 months of age. Methods: We analysed electronic health records for children born between 01/01/2014 and 30/10/2019 and registered with primary care general practices (GPs) in north-east London (NEL). Primary outcome was receipt of first MMR vaccination between 12 and 24 months of age and residential mobility was defined by number of GP-recorded addresses by vaccination date or 24 months of age. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of receipt of MMR vaccination by residential mobility, adjusting for sex, ethnicity, number of children in the household, household composition, area-level deprivation, and local government area of residence. Results: We included 150,949 children (51.0% boys) of whom 127,958 (84.8%) had received a first MMR vaccination and 22.3% had more than one GP-recorded address. Compared to children with one GP-recorded address, children with multiple GP-recorded addresses were at higher risk of not receiving their first MMR vaccination by 24 months of age. Those with two GP-recorded addresses had a 54% increased likelihood (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.44,0.48), and those with three or more GP-recorded addresses a 68% increased likelihood (0.32; 95% CI: 0.29,0.36), compared to those with one. Conclusions: Children who change address in early life are less likely to be protected against measles and other infections. Measles outbreaks in the UK have been in urban areas with high residential mobility and low MMR vaccine uptake suggesting the need for review of the immunisation status of children newly registered with GPs.

Indexed as

Measles-Mumps-Rubella VaccinePopulation DynamicsPrimary Health CareVaccinationChild, PreschoolElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInfantLondonMaleMeaslesMumpsMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccinechildrenelectronic health recordsMMRresidential mobilityvaccination

Identifiers

PMID42211010
PMCPMC13213897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.