Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210958›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

AI-based decision models for difficult airway assessment: from research innovation to clinical implementation-a narrative review.

Yang Shen, Yulan Wu, Yuwei Qiu, Jingxiang Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang ShenSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Yulan WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuwei QiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jingxiang WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Difficult airway management causes significant anesthesia-related morbidity, yet traditional assessments lack sensitivity (30%-50%) and consistency. This review (2010-2025) examines artificial intelligence (AI) decision models for airway assessment, focusing on performance, limitations, and clinical translation. AI demonstrates significant statistical superiority: facial image analysis achieves 80%-90% sensitivity (vs. Mallampati's 39%), and deep learning models yield a pooled AUC of 0.84. Key techniques include convolutional neural networks, semi-supervised learning, and multimodal integration. Despite high predictive performance, widespread adoption faces fundamental barriers. Current studies are predominantly single-center and retrospective, lacking external validation, algorithmic fairness, standardized outcomes, and proven workflow integration. Furthermore, research heavily favors upper airway evaluation. Thoracic anesthesia, utilizing routine preoperative CTs, offers an immediate pathway for comprehensive whole-airway assessment. Ultimately, bridging the translational gap requires rigorous, prospective multicenter validation demonstrating tangible patient safety improvements, rather than relying solely on algorithmic sophistication.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical prediction modelsdifficult airwaymachine learningperioperative medicine

Identifiers

PMID42210958
PMCPMC13212430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.