ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A three-gene expression signature predicts lymph node metastasis in cervical squamous cell carcinoma: development and validation using TCGA and clinical cohorts.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a major prognostic determinant in early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); however, conventional preoperative imaging has demonstrated sensitivities below 60% for sub-centimeter metastases, resulting in treatment misallocation for approximately 20-30% of patients. Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a minimal gene expression signature that can be performed on routine biopsy specimens to predict preoperative LNM in cervical SCC. Methods: This retrospective biomarker discovery and validation study had a two-phase design. In the discovery phase, we analyzed transcriptomic data from 116 The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cervical SCC samples and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) false discovery rate correction (FDR < 0.10). Then, we refined them using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The locked signature was independently validated in a prospectively collected cohort of 202 patients (101 LNM-positive patients and 101 LNM-negative patients) from the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), with histopathological lymphadenectomy confirmation as the reference standard. Performance was assessed based on area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and bootstrap internal validation. Decision curve analysis and a combined molecular-clinical model were also evaluated. Results: Of the 231 DE genes, a three-gene signature (LOC494141, GLOD5, and GML) was identified by sequential filtering. In the independent validation cohort, the signature achieved an AUC of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.676-0.814), with a sensitivity of 62.38%, a specificity of 64.36%, a positive predictive value of 63.64%, and a negative predictive value of 63.11%. Bootstrap validation confirmed model robustness (optimism-corrected AUC: 0.722; calibration slope: 0.913; Hosmer-Lemeshow Conclusion: This three-gene expression signature provides clinically informative preoperative risk stratification for LNM in cervical SCC. Intended as a complementary tool within integrated clinical assessment frameworks rather than a standalone diagnostic tool, this affordable qRT-PCR-based assay holds particular promise for resource-limited settings, pending prospective multicenter validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.