ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Current status of vision and refractive errors among children and adolescents in northeast Sichuan, China: a school-based cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the status of visual acuity and refractive errors among children and adolescents in northeastern Sichuan, providing a basis for targeted myopia prevention and control. Methods: In 2024, a school-based vision screening program using a stratified cluster sampling framework was conducted among students from participating schools in 3 districts and 6 counties of Nanchong City. Visual acuity screening and non-cycloplegic autorefraction were performed using an electronic intelligent screening system with real-time data collection and strict quality control. Of the 61,012 students initially screened, 59,319 students with complete and analyzable data were included in the final analysis, corresponding to an effective screening rate of 97.23%. Detection rates and distribution characteristics of poor visual acuity and suspected myopia were analyzed, along with associated risk factors. Results: The prevalence of poor visual acuity and suspected myopia increased markedly with educational stage, reaching 90.81% and nearly 90%, respectively, in general senior high school students, accompanied by a parallel increase in myopia severity and high myopia proportion. Suspected myopia was more common among female students. Substantial regional disparities were observed, with the highest prevalence in Nanbu County (80.49%) and the lowest in Langzhong City (46.41%). Urban students had significantly higher myopia prevalence than township students. In addition, during the general senior high stage, students in ordinary schools showed significantly higher myopia prevalence than those in key schools. Regarding vision correction, eyeglasses were the predominant method. The rate of spectacle use increased with education level, though proper correction remained suboptimal. Additionally, astigmatism and anisometropia were prevalent among myopic students and increased with school grade. Hyperopia reserve declined progressively in lower-grade students. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that school grade, gender, regional type, and school level were independently associated with myopia. Conclusions: This study reveals the epidemiological characteristics and influencing factors of visual acuity and refractive errors among children and adolescents in northeastern Sichuan, providing essential data and scientific evidence for the development of targeted myopia prevention strategies in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.