Articlenpj natural hazards2026
Urban emissions and expansion intensify extreme precipitation and flood susceptibility in Texas.
Article in npj natural hazards, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Texas Triangle is rapidly expanding and increasingly vulnerable to extreme rainfall and floods. Using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem), we simulate a cold-season frontal storm and a prolonged warm-season event, comparing a present-day configuration with an end-of-century urban-expansion scenario consistent with Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 5 projections. Across scenarios, meteorological boundary conditions are held fixed, while urban land cover is expanded and anthropogenic emissions are enhanced accordingly. In the cold-season case, urban growth enhances activation of fine-mode cloud condensation nuclei, strengthens updrafts, and produces statistically significant precipitation increases over San Antonio and Austin. In the warm-season case, the response is heterogeneous, with early enhancement on the western side of Dallas-Fort Worth followed by suppression eastward as the system evolves. Flood-risk analysis, based on the model-diagnosed runoff coefficient and a high-resolution stochastic framework (SCS-CN), reveals a systematic expansion of high-risk zones under future urbanization, amplifying existing runoff hotspots and generating new ones across metropolitan areas. Overall, the consistency between the WRF-Chem runoff diagnostics and the stochastic SCS-CN framework supports the use of WRF-Chem as a first-order, spatially explicit indicator of relative urban flood risk under extreme precipitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.