ArticleMedical engineering & physics2026
Rapid coronary artery stent computational simulation using the simplex deformable model.
Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to present and demonstrate the feasibility of a simplex deformable model (SDM) for patient-specific coronary stent simulations in two patient-specific cases. Patient-specific 3D artery anatomies were converted into triangular meshes and then transformed into 2-simplex meshes. For each vertex, three neighboring vertices were used to compute outward and inward normal vectors to model stent expansion and arterial wall resistance. Internal forces representing stent mechanics were computed during expansion, and external forces incorporating non-linear hyperelastic arterial behavior were applied after stent-wall contact. Two patient-specific arteries were simulated using the SDM framework, with the finite element method (FEM) as the reference. Relative to FEM, the SDM achieved 360-670 times faster computational time, and reduced vertex counts by 9.5-12.6 times. Bland-Altman analysis showed small mean biases in mean lumen diameter (-0.029 mm for Artery 1;-0.043 mm for Artery 2), and root mean square error was small (0.063 mm for Artery 1; 0.098 mm for Artery 2), and the mean absolute relative error was also low (1.75% for Artery 1; 2.31% for Artery 2). In conclusion, this proof-of-concept study in two patient-specific 3D coronary anatomies suggests that the proposed SDM-based simulations can achieve overall agreement with FEM, while substantially reducing computational time and mesh size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.