Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210657›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2026

Associations of plasma proteomic and polygenic profiling with incident psoriasis risk: a prospective cohort study.

Ting Tian, Tian Tian, Tongtong Hong, Yong He, Xiaoke Wang, Leqi Qian, Sihan Deng, Ruixin Zhou, Mingjun Jiang, Jingyi Fan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ting Tian *Central Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Tian Tian *Central Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Tongtong Hong *Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Yong HeCentral Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoke WangCentral Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Leqi QianCentral Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Sihan DengCentral Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Ruixin ZhouCentral Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Mingjun JiangCentral Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.
Jingyi FanHealth Management Center, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Yuancheng LiCentral Research Laboratory, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Dermatology, Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psoriasis is a common chronic immune-mediated disease with substantial systemic and public health burden, yet early molecular signatures associated with its onset remain insufficiently characterised. Although both circulating proteins and genetic susceptibility may contribute to psoriasis development, their prospective and joint associations with incident psoriasis remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the individual and combined effects of proteomic and polygenic profiling on psoriasis risk. Methods: We identified psoriasis-related protein signature using plasma proteomic data (2919 proteins) from 39 377 individuals in the UK Biobank. We prioritised eight biomarkers to formulate protein risk scores (ProSs) and computed polygenic risk scores (PRSs) using 62 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Then, we used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate association of ProS and PRS with psoriasis risk, and performed stratified and sensitivity to explore the robustness of our findings. Results: A total of 479 incident psoriasis cases occurred over a median follow-up of 13.60 years (interquartile range = 12.89-14.31). The hazard ratios (HRs) for psoriasis were 1.40 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.80) and 2.72 (95% CI = 2.17-3.42) in the medium and high ProS groups, respectively, vs. the low ProS group (P-value for trend <0.001). When considering genetic susceptibility, participants with a high PRS and a high ProS had a greater risk of incident psoriasis (HR = 4.25; 95% CI = 2.97-6.07) compared to those with a low PRS and low ProS, as well as a greater 10-year absolute risk (25.99 per 1000 individuals). They also had a relative excess risk of 2.16 (95% CI = 0.98-3.35) due to additive interaction, accounting for 49% (95% CI = 29%-69%) of the psoriasis incidence. In the high genetic risk group, compared with individuals with low ProS, those with high ProS had an excess risk of 18.45 (95% CI = 17.90-18.98) cases per 1000 individuals over 10 years. Conclusions: Integrating the proteomic and polygenic tools could help improve the precision of psoriasis risk classification and facilitate the identification of high-risk populations.

Indexed as

ProteomicsPsoriasisAdultBiomarkersFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic Risk ScoreHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited KingdomBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42210657
PMCPMC13219973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.