ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Identification of Major Depressive Disorder Using Multiple Functional Connection Patterns.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiplex functional connectome graph transformer for cognitive vulnerability in dialysis-treated chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant challenge to global mental health, highlighting the urgent need for effective diagnostic tools to enable early and accurate detection. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) has garnered considerable attention for evaluating MDD through functional connectivity networks (FCNs). While graph convolutional networks (GCNs) have advanced FCN analysis by capturing complex interregional connection patterns, existing GCN-based approaches have predominantly focused on a single connection pattern, thereby neglecting the multifaceted information encoded in diverse connection profiles.
methodsWe propose a Multiple Functional Connection Patterns Graph Convolutional Network (MFCP) that integrates three distinct connection patterns-sparse representation, Pearson correlation, and Granger causality mapping-to leverage their complementary information. The proposed framework employs multiple graph convolutional modules to integrate diverse connectivity information, thereby enhancing MDD-related diagnostic features extracted from FCNs. We conducted primary experiments on the REST-MDD dataset Site 20, comprising 533 subjects, to evaluate the proposed MFCP.
resultsThe MFCP framework achieved superior diagnostic performance with an accuracy of 87.74%, precision of 86.21%, recall of 90.91%, F1-score of 88.50%, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.9326. Comparative analysis revealed that integrating three connection patterns significantly outperformed single-pattern approaches (accuracy range: 72.64%-81.13%) and two-pattern combinations (accuracy range: 77.36%-83.02%). t-SNE visualization confirmed enhanced class separability with increasing pattern integration, while Grad-CAM analysis identified distinct discriminative brain regions across different connectivity patterns.
conclusionsThe proposed MFCP framework effectively integrates multiple functional connection patterns to enhance diagnostic feature extraction, demonstrating strong effectiveness for MDD identification. These findings suggest that leveraging complementary connectivity information through multi-pattern integration represents a promising approach for improving automated MDD diagnosis based on rs-fMRI functional connectivity analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.