Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210524›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2026

Neglected seed dispersers and research compartmentalisation: how much do we know about what we don't know?

Sara Beatriz Mendes, Esther Sebastián-González, Alistair G Auffret, Irene Castañeda, Andy J Green, Casper H A van Leeuwen, Christophe Baltzinger, Ádám Lovas-Kiss, Isabel Donoso, Ricardo Soares and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara Beatriz MendesDepartment of Biodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3149-9743
Esther Sebastián-GonzálezDepartment of Ecology, University of Alicante, Alicante, 03690, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7229-1845
Alistair G AuffretDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-4423
Irene CastañedaEcology and Genetics of Conservation and Restoration, UMR INRA 1202 BIOGECO, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, 33615, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2490-2178
Andy J GreenDepartment of Conservation Biology and Global Change, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD), CSIC, Américo Vespucio 26, Seville, 41092, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-4951
Casper H A van LeeuwenDepartment of Ecology, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, AJ, 6525, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-7775
Christophe BaltzingerResearch Unit Forest Ecosystems, INRAE Val de Loire, Nogent-sur-Vernisson, 45290, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2980-6238
Ádám Lovas-KissMTA-HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Momentum Dispersal Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8811-1623
Isabel DonosoBC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change, Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Sede Building 1, 1st floor Barrio Sarriena s/n, Leioa, 48940, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0287-9026
Ricardo SoaresCentre for Functional Ecology, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, 3000-456, Portugal.
Ruben HelenoCentre for Functional Ecology, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, 3000-456, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4808-4907

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigacion MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Agencia Estatal de Investigacion PID2020-112774GB-I00Agencia Estatal de Investigacion RYC2019-027216-IFoundation for Science and Technology - FCT 10.54499/LA/P/0092/2020Foundation for Science and Technology - FCT 10.54499/UIDB/04004/2025Generalitat Valenciana CIAORG/2021/13Hungarian Academy of Sciences Momentum Research ProgramLE STUDIUM Loire Valley Institute for Advanced StudiesMaría de Maeztu Excellence Unit 2023-2027 (CEX2021-001201-M) MCIN/AEI/10.13039/50110001103National Scientific Research OTKA-FK 138698National Scientific Research OTKA-PD 145938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed dispersal is critical for long-term ecosystem resilience. However, excessive compartmentalisation of research into particular disperser guilds (e.g. birds) hampers our understanding of their relative contributions to overall seed dispersal, risking erroneous conclusions and overlooking key information gaps. Here, we evaluate how information about over 11 000 interactions between 1902 plant and 455 animal species in Europe accumulated over 400 years, and estimate information completeness across disperser guilds, plant types, and dispersal mechanisms (endozoochory, epizoochory, synzoochory, and myrmecochory). Information regarding the plants dispersed by each group of animals ranges from 27% to 79% sample coverage, with birds of prey (27%), ants (28%), and rodents (31%) particularly understudied. Most research focussed on fleshy-fruited plants rather than dry-fruited plants, and most on internal dispersal as the mechanism (endozoochory). Interestingly, scientists' perceptions of what are the most neglected disperser guilds do not correlate with our sample coverage estimates, showing an inability of the scientific community to identify information gaps. We urge researchers to bridge research silos and to study overlooked guilds, mechanisms, and plant types. Implementing community-level synthesis studies that integrate data across guilds is essential for accurately predicting ecosystem responses to global change and developing effective conservation strategies.

Indexed as

ResearchSeed DispersalAnimalsEcosystemdiasporeecosystem servicesfrugivorymyrmecochorypublication biasresearch silossample coveragezoochory

Identifiers

PMID42210524
PMCPMC13326527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.