ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026
Persistence and Contemporary Clinical Applications of Mohs Paste: A Scoping Review.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mohs paste (MP), a zinc chloride-based tissue fixative developed by Frederic E. Mohs, was historically central to skin cancer treatment but declined worldwide following the adoption of the fresh-tissue technique and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Japan remains a notable exception; MMS is not as widely adopted there, while MP persists as a symptom-directed practice across multiple disciplines. We systematically characterized the indications, applications, and limitations of MP to contextualize its contemporary clinical relevance. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed and Scopus were searched through March 2025 for peer-reviewed reports describing the clinical use of Mohs paste, ointment, or chemosurgery as therapeutic interventions for surface or ulcerative lesions. Reports using MP solely as an adjunct within MMS or those without original cases were excluded, and data were synthesized thematically. Fifty-two studies (1964-2024) described 88 patients (36 case reports; 16 case series), predominantly from Japan (48 reports). Patients were mostly female (80.7%) with a median age of 68 years, and most presented with locally advanced or stage III-IV disease. Indications included breast, gynecologic, head and neck, and skin cancers, alongside metastatic cutaneous tumors, sarcomas, and oral cancers, with isolated reports of chronic ulcers and schwannoma. At least one local outcome was reported in 87 patients (98.9%), based on descriptive and non-standardized reporting. Frequently reported local outcomes included bleeding control (78.4%), reduction of exudate (62.5%), reduction of malodor (47.7%), and reduction of tumor volume (44.3%). The most commonly reported adverse event was pain, which required analgesics in some cases. MP was occasionally used concurrently with systemic drug therapy or radiotherapy to stabilize local symptoms. Overall, MP has evolved into a pragmatic, symptom-directed intervention bridging oncology and palliative care. These findings highlight the need for standardized protocols, registry-based evaluation, and clearer positioning of MP within contemporary clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.