Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2026
Better 10-Year Cerebrovascular Outcome After Transplant Than on Standard-Care in Sickle Cell Anemia: DREPAGREFFE Trial.
Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is There a Difference in Occurrence of Complications Between Adults With Hemoglobin SS and Hemoglobin SC Disease: An Extended Systematic Review.European journal of haematology · 2026Pooled it
- Better 10-Year Cerebrovascular Outcome After Transplant Than on Standard-Care in Sickle Cell Anemia: DREPAGREFFE Trial.American journal of hematology · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Management of cerebral vasculopathy in sickle cell anemia (SCA) includes standard-care, that is, chronic transfusion (CT) or hydroxyurea, and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). DREPAGREFFE-1 (December 2010/June 2013), a French multicenter trial, was the first prospective trial comparing standard-care to match sibling donor (MSD)-HCT in 67 (35F/32M) SCA children (5-15 year) on CT for abnormal time-averaged mean maximum velocities (TAMMV ≥ 200 cm/s). Seven had a stroke history. We reported that MSD-HCT reduced the highest TAMMVs at 1- and 3-year (p < 0.001) and improved quality of life (QoL) for physical and school functioning. In stroke-free patients, the 3-year stenosis score was lower (p = 0.010). Nevertheless, no significant difference was observed for silent cerebral infarcts (SCI) and cognitive performance. This prompted us to initiate DREPAGREFFE-2 to reevaluate the outcomes at 10 years (September 2022/August 2024) with the same 67 SCA children. No death or stroke occurred in either arm. No rejection or chronic-GvHD arose in the MSD-HCT group (n = 32). In the standard-care group (n = 35), 16 were on hydroxyurea, and 16 on CT at Year 10, and 3 received haploidentical-HCT. After MSD-HCT, the QoL was better, even for social functioning, and the number of hospitalizations, hospitalized days (p < 0.001), and crises (p = 0.001) was lower than on standard-care. In stroke-free patients, stenosis (p = 0.027) and SCI scores (p = 0.041) decreased significantly more after MSD-HCT than on standard-care; working memory (p = 0.016) and processing speed (p = 0.011) improved significantly after MSD-HCT, but worsened on standard-care. These effects were not previously detected with shorter follow-up. This supports earlier consideration of HCT for SCA children with MSD to preserve neurologic function and QoL for a more productive future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.