ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Associations between urinary arsenic and vitamin D deficiency: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2011-2018.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arsenic exposure and vitamin D deficiency independently contribute to adverse neurological and systemic outcomes, yet their interplay in the general population has not been thoroughly characterized. We investigated the association between urinary arsenic (total arsenic and dimethylarsinate [DMA]) and vitamin D deficiency and explored how this relationship varies by demographic, behavioral, laboratory, dietary, and neurological comorbidity factors. Using data from 6,148 U.S. adults aged ≥ 18 years in NHANES 2011-2018, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) for deficiency per interquartile‑range increase in each arsenic measure using survey-weighted logistic regression. After full adjustment for demographics, lifestyle, dietary, and clinical factors, the ORs for total urinary arsenic and DMA were 1.30 (95% CI 1.16, 1.45) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.27, 1.78), respectively. Associations were strongest among women; adults aged < 60 years; Non‑Hispanic, highly educated, underweight individuals; as well as current smokers and drinkers. In contrast, participants with stroke or sleep disorders exhibited inverse associations, likely due to routine clinical vitamin D supplementation. These findings demonstrate a robust, dose‑dependent association between arsenic exposure and vitamin D deficiency in U.S. adults. They suggest the importance of integrated public health strategies-combining arsenic mitigation with targeted vitamin D strategies-and highlight the need for longitudinal and interventional studies to establish causality and to determine whether optimizing vitamin D status might potentially modify the adverse health effects of arsenic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.