ArticleBMC psychology2026
Intergenerational trauma and collective identity among the Jinghpaw: a qualitative exploration.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore how decades of civil war in Kachin State, Myanmar, contributed to intergenerational trauma among the Jinghpaw people and to explore how this trauma shaped their collective identity across generations. Drawing upon Family Systems Theory, Cultural Trauma Theory, Social Identity Theory, and Self-Categorization Theory, and informed by the SHARE Model of Trauma Recovery, the study conceptualized trauma as both a psychological and socio-cultural phenomenon transmitted within families and communities rather than as an individual clinical experience alone. A qualitative, multi-generational design was employed, involving 18 participants across six families, drawn from both internally displaced persons (IDP) and non-IDP contexts. Findings revealed that intergenerational trauma among the Jinghpaw people was transmitted primarily through authoritative, fear-based, and survival-oriented parenting styles reinforced by coping mechanisms such as emotional restraint, hypervigilance, moralized endurance, and silence. These strategies limited emotional openness but enabled families to adapt to prolonged insecurity, maintain moral order, and protect future generations from perceived threats. They deepened the pre-existing collective orientation rooted in kinship, spirituality, cultural rituals, and communal resilience practices. The study further demonstrated that war-related suffering was not only endured but also interpreted as part of a broader narrative of cultural survival, political struggle, and communal solidarity. Collective memory and spiritual and cultural pride emerged as significant forces sustaining identity under conditions of displacement and marginalization. Most notably, political pride became the most enduring legacy of intergenerational trauma, as families across generations reframed their suffering as moral and political testimony to the Kachin struggle for autonomy, dignity, and cultural survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.