ArticleBMC psychology2026
Traces of hope in the shadow of war: an exploration of preschoolers' meaning-making processes of the war concept through visual and verbal narratives.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite increasing global exposure of young children to war and conflict, there is limited understanding of how preschool children perceive and make sense of such complex and emotionally charged phenomena. This gap limits educators' ability to recognize children's emotional expressions, support their meaning-making processes, and develop trauma-sensitive, peace-oriented pedagogical practices. This study aimed to examine how preschool children (n = 556; aged 4-6 years) in Turkey conceptualize war through drawings and narratives, and to explore the symbolic, emotional, social, and experiential dimensions embedded in these expressions, with the broader goal of informing educational approaches that foster emotional literacy, empathy, and resilience in early childhood contexts. Framed by an interpretive-descriptive qualitative design, visual and verbal data were treated as a single integrated corpus, open-coded, and organized inductively into themes. Trustworthiness was enhanced through data triangulation (drawings and narratives), expert review, and intercoder agreement exceeding 90%. Five overarching themes were identified. Children primarily conceptualized war through concrete visual and symbolic elements (weaponry, authority figures, and national symbols), extended it to physical, ecological, and life-related destruction (damaged homes, burned environments, displacement, and hunger), and depicted pronounced emotional and psychological responses (sadness, fear, pain as well as captivity and helplessness). Social relations and interactions were depicted as marked by violence, chaos, and loneliness. In contrast, children articulated peace, solidarity, and healing through symbols such as suns, hearts, rainbows, nature, play, and acts of kindness, signaling resilience and moral imagination. Together, these findings indicate that even young children engage in sophisticated, multilayered meaning-making processes related to war, drawing simultaneously on emotional, social, and hopeful dimensions. The findings highlight the pedagogical value of art- and dialogue-based approaches for emotional literacy, trauma-sensitive practice, and nature- and play-anchored restorative learning in early childhood education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.