ArticleReproductive health2026
WASH facility adequacy and school attendance during menstruation among secondary school girls in Nasarawa West, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdequate Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) facilities are essential for menstrual hygiene management (MHM) and school retention among adolescent girls. Many Nigerian schools lack such infrastructure, which has been associated with menstruation-related absenteeism and compromised menstrual wellbeing among adolescent girls. This study assessed WASH facility adequacy in secondary schools in Nasarawa West Senatorial Zone and examined associations with girls' school attendance during menstruation.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,250 female students across 25 secondary schools in Keffi, Nasarawa, and Kokona LGAs. WASH adequacy was assessed using a structured observational checklist, scoring 12 facility components (water availability, toilet conditions, privacy, lighting, handwashing facilities, and disposal systems). Student attendance during menstruation was assessed via structured questionnaire using a four-point frequency scale (always, sometimes, rarely, never), with absenteeism defined as reporting sometimes, rarely, or never attending during menstruation. Chi-square analyses with cluster-robust standard errors examined associations between WASH adequacy and menstruation-related absenteeism.
resultsWASH conditions were critically inadequate, approximately 40% of schools had functional water sources, 28% had water available during assessment, and 16% had separate girls' toilets. Privacy features, handwashing facilities with soap, and covered disposal bins were each present in 16% of schools. No school provided private changing spaces, sanitary waste disposal systems, emergency sanitary supplies, or MHM education materials. Private schools scored marginally higher than public schools (1.2 ± 0.3 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3). Only 36.8% of students consistently attended school during menstruation. Absenteeism was strongly associated with inadequate WASH facilities (χ² = 48.3, p < 0.001), with pain or cramps (32%), lack of pads (23.2%), and fear of staining (19.2%) as the most frequently reported reasons.
conclusionWASH facilities in Nasarawa West secondary schools are grossly inadequate and associated with menstruation-related absenteeism. Urgent interventions including improved water supply, private toilets, disposal systems, and access to menstrual materials are required to support girls' menstrual health and educational equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.