Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210350›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Puzzle-based pedagogic activity to address rote learning of antibiotic classes in clinical pharmacology course for undergraduate nursing students.

Constanza Morén, Emi Ruiz Mariscal, Mónica Negredo, María Preciado, Gemma Martínez, Mireia Llaurado-Serra, Antonio Rosa, Melinda González, Natàlia Rodríguez, Laura Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Constanza Morén *Clinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. constanza.moren@ub.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-7407
Emi Ruiz Mariscal *Clinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mónica NegredoClinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4263-6408
María PreciadoClinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Gemma MartínezClinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia Llaurado-SerraClinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5123-0581
Antonio RosaClinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-9413
Melinda GonzálezClinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Natàlia RodríguezInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. nrodriguezfe@ub.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9618-9383
Laura MartínezClinical and Fundamental Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1300-249X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the impact of an active learning strategy, the Puzzle technique, on nursing students' knowledge acquisition and engagement in Clinical Pharmacology, focusing on antibiotics.

backgroundAbsenteeism and low motivation among university students pose significant challenges in higher education. Traditional rote learning methods often lead to disengagement, particularly in content-heavy subjects such as Clinical Pharmacology. Within this field, learning antibiotic classes requires extensive memorization, which may hinder students' performance and retention of knowledge. Given the increasing role of nurses in antibiotic prescription, enhancing their pharmacological training is essential.

designEducational intervention study with three intervention groups and two control groups, including within-group pre-post assessments.

methodsA total of 330 s-year nursing students from the University of Barcelona participated. Three groups (A, B, and C) engaged in the Puzzle intervention, while two groups (D and E) served as controls, thereby receiving only the standard theoretical instruction without any additional activity. The intervention consisted of a peer-to-peer collaborative activity where students were assigned specific antibiotic topics to teach their peers. Learning outcomes were assessed through a quiz, midterm, and final exams.

resultsIntervention groups demonstrated significantly higher accuracy in quiz (p < 0.001) and exam accuracy percentages (p < 0.001) compared to controls. Among the intervention groups, students who participated in the activity outperformed their intra-group controls. Additionally, students reported high satisfaction and perceived applicability in learning consolidation.

conclusionsOur findings specifically pertain to undergraduate nursing students and undergraduate nursing education. The Puzzle technique effectively enhanced knowledge retention of antibiotic drug classes within Clinical Pharmacology. This peer-to-peer approach may serve as a valuable pedagogical tool for improving learning outcomes in nursing education, particularly in complex pharmacological subjects.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureatePharmacology, ClinicalProblem-Based LearningStudents, NursingAdultCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleSpainYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsClinical PharmacologyNursing studentsPuzzle activity

Identifiers

PMID42210350
PMCPMC13404095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.