ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Characteristics and temporal trends of EU teratological safety signals and information dissemination to healthcare professionals in the Netherlands-A contribution of the ConcePTION project.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics and temporal trends of EU teratological safety signals and information dissemination to healthcare professionals in the Netherlands-A contribution of the ConcePTION project.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimAlthough regulatory responses to safety signals have been studied, pregnancy-specific data and their dissemination to medical professionals remain unclear. This study examined the characteristics and temporal trends of teratological safety signals prompting the European Medicines Agency to implement risk minimization measures. A secondary aim was to investigate how information on these signals, independent of regulatory communication, was disseminated to medical professionals in the Netherlands.
methodsTeratological safety signals from 2002 to 2022 were retrieved from the European Pharmacovigilance Issues Tracking Tool. For each signal, we recorded the dates of market authorization, first spontaneous report, scientific publication, regulatory decision and dissemination through the Teratology Information Service (TIS) and Dutch professional journals. The source of the signal (spontaneous reports, scientific literature or otherwise) was assessed. Time intervals between events were calculated and visualized.
resultsTwenty-four safety signals pertaining to fetal teratogenesis were identified. At the time of regulatory action, medicines had been on the market for a median of 23.9 years (range 3.2-59.3). Cases or studies published in the scientific literature were the origin for most (n = 18, 75%) teratological safety signals. Amendments of the product information was a regulatory action for all signals; eight (33%) also triggered Direct Healthcare Professional Communications. Apart from these regulatory communications, information may have reached healthcare professionals through scientific literature or other channels, sometimes before and sometimes alongside regulatory decisions.
conclusionTeratological safety signals are predominantly scientific literature-driven and often arise decades after marketing. Scientific publications and TIS may provide early guidance, frequently preceding regulatory decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.