Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210341›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026

Characteristics and temporal trends of EU teratological safety signals and information dissemination to healthcare professionals in the Netherlands-A contribution of the ConcePTION project.

Yrea R J van Rijt-Weetink, Rosanne E Huisman, Jan-Peter van Wieringen, H J M J Ineke Crijns, Florence P A M van Hunsel, Anneke L M Passier, Sander Borgsteede, A C G Toine Egberts, Laura M Yates, Eugène P van Puijenbroek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yrea R J van Rijt-WeetinkGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5997-3718
Rosanne E HuismanGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0764-5248
Jan-Peter van WieringenMedicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4914-9303
H J M J Ineke CrijnsMedicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Florence P A M van HunselGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-3224
Anneke L M PassierPharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5594-6360
Sander BorgsteedeGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-6139
A C G Toine EgbertsDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-7779
Laura M YatesUniversity of Kwazulu-Natal, KRISP, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7963-625X
Eugène P van PuijenbroekGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-1398

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 821520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAlthough regulatory responses to safety signals have been studied, pregnancy-specific data and their dissemination to medical professionals remain unclear. This study examined the characteristics and temporal trends of teratological safety signals prompting the European Medicines Agency to implement risk minimization measures. A secondary aim was to investigate how information on these signals, independent of regulatory communication, was disseminated to medical professionals in the Netherlands.

methodsTeratological safety signals from 2002 to 2022 were retrieved from the European Pharmacovigilance Issues Tracking Tool. For each signal, we recorded the dates of market authorization, first spontaneous report, scientific publication, regulatory decision and dissemination through the Teratology Information Service (TIS) and Dutch professional journals. The source of the signal (spontaneous reports, scientific literature or otherwise) was assessed. Time intervals between events were calculated and visualized.

resultsTwenty-four safety signals pertaining to fetal teratogenesis were identified. At the time of regulatory action, medicines had been on the market for a median of 23.9 years (range 3.2-59.3). Cases or studies published in the scientific literature were the origin for most (n = 18, 75%) teratological safety signals. Amendments of the product information was a regulatory action for all signals; eight (33%) also triggered Direct Healthcare Professional Communications. Apart from these regulatory communications, information may have reached healthcare professionals through scientific literature or other channels, sometimes before and sometimes alongside regulatory decisions.

conclusionTeratological safety signals are predominantly scientific literature-driven and often arise decades after marketing. Scientific publications and TIS may provide early guidance, frequently preceding regulatory decisions.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsHealth PersonnelInformation DisseminationPharmacovigilanceTeratogensEuropean UnionFemaleHumansNetherlandsPregnancyTeratogenesisTeratologyTeratogensdrug safetypregnancyregulatory decisionsafety signalteratology

Identifiers

PMID42210341
PMCPMC13619037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.