Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210320›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

Feasibility and pilot study protocol of the SURE programme: a co-designed whole-school approach intervention to promote migrant-background adolescents wellbeing in secondary education.

Rocío Herrero Romero, Kevin van der Meulen, Laura Granizo, Cristina Del Barrio, Pablo Puyol, Laura Lara, Ricardo Olmos, Miruna Bivol, Kappa Grealy, María Gadea Jiménez and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Rocío Herrero RomeroUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. rocio.herrero@uam.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2879-6499
Kevin van der MeulenUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Laura GranizoUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Del BarrioUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo PuyolUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Laura LaraUniversidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Ricardo OlmosUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Miruna BivolUniversitat Oberta Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Kappa GrealyNational College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
María Gadea JiménezUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nidhi PatelGraduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yi ChenUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Margarita SáenzUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Yulia ShenderovichWolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Anna BibouAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Salonica, Greece.
Olga Lucía Hoyos de Los RíosUniversidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Maria KotovaUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Vicent PalermUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nerea RamosUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-126886OA-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents with a migrant background may be at greater risk of experiencing poor mental health and psychosocial wellbeing. Whole-school approach (WSA) interventions with strong stakeholder commitment are considered to be a promising avenue for improving this population's wellbeing. Using such an approach, the co-designed universal SURE intervention aims to nurture a positive school climate and provide social support for migrant-background adolescents in Madrid, Spain, with the wider objective of bolstering adolescent wellbeing.

methodsConducted in two medium-sized secondary schools in Getafe (Madrid), this research comprises two distinct components. First, a feasibility study utilises a pragmatic mixed-methods design to assess the implementation process and acceptability of the SURE intervention among students, staff, families, and community stakeholders. Second, an exploratory pilot study employs a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group design to estimate parameters for a future trial. During the 2025-2026 academic year, the intervention school will receive the SURE programme, while the comparison school follows the standard curriculum. Quantitative outcome data will be collected via self-report from students in 2° and 3° ESO (aged 13-15). Primary feasibility outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, intervention fidelity, and acceptability; secondary outcomes will be used to descriptively explore clinical mental health indicators (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, positive affect, and life satisfaction), alongside educational engagement and school participation.  DISCUSSION: This pilot and feasibility study aims to determine whether the SURE intervention procedures are acceptable and viable within the secondary education context. Findings will allow the research team to refine the intervention protocols, underlying mechanisms, and outcome measures. This process is essential to ensure the precision of estimates and the robustness of the research techniques before the SURE programme is scaled up and evaluated in a larger, definitive cluster randomised controlled trial.

trial registrationThe trial was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XQ52T ) before the enrolment of the first participant.

Indexed as

Adolescent wellbeingMigrants and refugeesPilot and feasibility studyProtocolSchool-based interventionWhole-school approach

Identifiers

PMID42210320
PMCPMC13411845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.