Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210317›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Are primary healthcare facilities in Ethiopia complying with accessibility standards for disability-inclusion? an accessibility audit in Bahir Dar City.

Desta Debalkie Atnafu, Femke Bannink Mbazzi, Abdmagidu Menya, Mezgebu Yitayal, Hannah Kuper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Desta Debalkie AtnafuInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. desta.debalkie@lshtm.ac.uk.
Femke Bannink MbazziInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Abdmagidu MenyaDisability Research Group, MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, P.O.Box 49, Entebbe City, Uganda.
Mezgebu YitayalDepartment of Health System and Policy, School of Public Health, Bahir Dar University, P.O.Box 79, Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia.
Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research 301621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccessible health facilities are a crucial component of disability-inclusive healthcare. Yet audits are rarely undertaken, particularly in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). This study evaluated the accessibility of Ethiopia's primary healthcare facilities to determine its readiness for delivering disability-inclusive services. Furthermore, it proposes actionable solutions to guide national efforts in strengthening health system inclusivity.

methodsA cross-sectional accessibility audit was conducted across all 10 public primary healthcare facilities in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. We collected data through a structured Disability Awareness Checklist, using face-to-face, participatory and action-oriented interviews with medical directors. This was complemented by direct observations of facility premises, and physical measurements (e.g. ramp slopes) across four dimensions: universal design, reasonable accommodation, staff capacity, and disability service linkages. We computed median percentage accessibility scores and compared between urban and rural facilities using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Additionally, Spearman's correlation was used to examine relationships between accessibility, patient flow, and staffing levels. Finally, facility staff co-proposed tailored action plans to address identified gaps.

resultsThe median overall accessibility score was 35% (range: 14-60%; maximum possible 100%), with urban facilities (42%) scoring higher than rural (18%). By dimension, the highest scores were for reasonable accommodation (47%), followed by staff capacity (42%) and universal design (31%). The lowest performance was recorded in linkages to disability-related services (8%). Differences in median accessibility scores were observed across facilities (χ² = 22.8, p ≤ 0.01) and core dimensions (χ² = 8.9, p < 0.05). Accessibility was strongly and positively correlated with both annual patient volume (ρ = 0.84, p < 0.01) and staff size (ρ = 0.83, p < 0.01). A median of 30 recommendations were proposed, with 45% requiring "high" funding, while 22% were identified as cost-free.

conclusionAccessibility standards for disability inclusion remain largely unmet across primary healthcare facilities in Ethiopia, with marked urban-rural disparities. This undermines the goals of equity and universal health coverage targeted for 2030. Closing these health equity gaps requires strengthening the health system through improved infrastructure, upgraded staff capacity for compassionate care, and stronger referral linkages. Furthermore, these measures are ultimately essential for guaranteeing inclusive, accessible, and rights-based primary care services, particularly in rural contexts.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPersons with DisabilitiesPrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHumansAccessibilityAuditDisabilityDisability awareness checklistEthiopiaPrimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID42210317
PMCPMC13425950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.