Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210275›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2026

Association between abdominal surgical incision type and midline intraperitoneal adhesion occurrence, findings from laparoscopic evaluation in a low-resource setting; a retrospective cohort of laparoscopic evaluations.

John Osaigbovoh Imaralu, Haleema Olalere, Mathew Babatunde Nathaniel, Oluwole Fiwawola Olatunji, Adebayo Adewole, Odutola Olawale Odugbemi, Naomi Okojie, Esosa Inioluwa Imaralu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John Osaigbovoh ImaraluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria. imaraluj@babcock.edu.ng.
Haleema OlalereDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Mathew Babatunde NathanielDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Oluwole Fiwawola OlatunjiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Adebayo AdewoleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Lokoja, Nigeria.
Odutola Olawale OdugbemiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Naomi OkojieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Esosa Inioluwa ImaraluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal incisions are mostly done in the umbilical or suprapubic regions, typically in the midline, to prevent visceral and vascular injury, by taking advantage of the greater distance between these incision sites and the intraabdominal structures. Unfortunately, adhesions often form at the peritoneal surfaces of these sites, making repeat surgical access, a daunting task. The study aimed to determine the relationship between surgical incision type and the occurrence, location, spread and severity of peritoneal adhesions.

methodsA Retrospective cohort study, involving laparoscopic evaluation of 296 patients. Laparoscopic entry was with the aid of a Veress needle in all cases, while insufflation was done with carbon dioxide using a pre-set pressure of 15mmHg for all diagnostic and 18-20mmHg, for all the operative procedures. The reported adhesions were scored using the Peritoneal Adhesion Index (PAI) score.

resultsThe prevalence of adhesion was 96/296 (32.4%) of laparoscopies, with majority 80/96 (83.3%) in the midline region. Over half of the adhesions were attached to the anterior abdominal wall. Previous peritoneal surgery (p = 0.004, ARR = 40.27, 16.47-64.77), was the main association with adhesion formation. This factor was also the main predictor of adhesion location within the midline regions (p < 0.001, ARR = 10.28, 3.11-34.58) this finding, was irrespective of surgical involvement of uterus or adnexa (p = 0.997). No association was, however, found between the risk of adhesion attachment to the anterior abdominal wall and presence of adhesion in the midline (p = 0.999) or individual midline regions; epigastric (p = 0.778), umbilical (p = 0.345), suprapubic (p = 0.999). Exploratory laparotomy (PAI = 10.80 ± 2.86), myomectomy (PAI = 10.89 ± 3.71) and salpingectomy (PAI = 11.00 ± 5.66) had more severe adhesions, while appendicectomy (PAI = 6.17 ± 3.74) and caesarean section (PAI = 7.47 ± 3.34) the least. Adhesion occurrence (p = 0.883), midline adhesion (p = 0.997) or anterior abdominal wall attachment (p = 0.327) were, however, not significantly associated with incision type.

conclusionPrevious peritoneal surgery, irrespective of uterine or adnexal involvement, was associated with increased risk for adhesion formation. The incision type and the depth of surgery, were, however, not significantly associated with adhesion formation, adhesion location or attachment to the anterior abdominal wall, suggesting an interplay of other operative surgical considerations.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallLaparoscopyPeritoneal DiseasesAbdomenAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTissue AdhesionsAdhesionIncisionLaparoscopyLaparotomyPeritoneumReoperation

Identifiers

PMID42210275
PMCPMC13430833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.