ArticleBMC biology2026
Microplastics reshape rhizosphere microbial communities and nutrient cycling in tomato agroecosystems.
Article in BMC biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroplastics (MPs) are emerging soil contaminants increasingly recognized for their capacity to alter agroecosystem functioning; however, their impacts on horticultural crops and rhizosphere microbial processes remain insufficiently understood.
resultsWe examined the impacts of MPs, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), on rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties, bacterial community structure, and functional genes associated with carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) cycling in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), a major horticultural crop cultivated worldwide. Both PVC-MPs and PE-MPs significantly reduced soil ammonium nitrogen and available phosphorus contents, modifying rhizosphere elemental composition. In contrast, PP-MPs had no significant effects on these nutrients but significantly increased soil pH by 0.76% compared with the control (p < 0.05). PE-MPs exposure markedly reduced bacterial α-diversity and selectively enriching bacterial taxa involved in recalcitrant organic matter degradation and nitrogen cycling. High-throughput quantitative PCR (qPCR) revealed that MPs suppressed the degradation of labile carbon substrates, including starch, cellulose, and hemicellulose (as evidenced by downregulation of apu, manB, and xylA), as well as methane metabolism, while promoting carbon fixation and phosphorus cycling.
conclusionsOur results indicate selective reprogramming of bacterial carbon metabolism, enhancing recalcitrant carbon turnover while constraining labile carbon mineralization, thereby disrupting C-P metabolic coupling and promoting soil organic carbon accumulation. Additionally, MPs stimulated nitrogen fixation and nitrification while inhibiting denitrification, particularly under PE- and PVC-MPs treatments. These findings provide bacterial ecological insights into MPs-induced reshape rhizosphere processes and nutrient cycling dynamics in horticultural systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.