Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210196›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

A multi-sequence MRI integration framework using SwinUNETR-v2 for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Rezq Muhammed Thabet, Howida A Shedeed, Maryam Al-Berry, Dina Khattab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rezq Muhammed ThabetDepartment of Scientific Computing, Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. rizk.mohamed@cis.asu.edu.eg.
Howida A Shedeed *Department of Scientific Computing, Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Maryam Al-Berry *Department of Scientific Computing, Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Dina Khattab *Department of Scientific Computing, Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic brain disease that affects the brain and spinal cord, where Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) plays a key role in diagnosis. While manual analysis of brain MRIs is important, it is time-consuming and prone to human error. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Computer Aided Diagnostic (CAD) systems have therefore gained traction due to their ability to provide more consistent and reliable assessments. This study presents a multi-sequence framework that integrates four MRI modalities with the SwinUNETR-v2 backbone for MS lesion segmentation. The main contribution is a task-oriented integration of multi-sequence input design (implemented as a four-channel volume representation), refined preprocessing (including balanced foreground/background patch extraction), and a weighted loss formulation under a controlled five-fold evaluation protocol. This approach achieved a peak DSC of 90.7% and a mean DSC of 88.3%. Moreover, when compared against other state-of-the-art segmentation methods-including AttentionUNet, DenseResidualUNet, SegResNet, FCNN, and nnUNet-v2-the multi-sequence SwinUNETR-v2 setup consistently outperformed these models across all key metrics, demonstrating strong effectiveness in identifying MS lesions.

Indexed as

BrainImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisHumansCAD toolsDeep LearningMRI ModalitiesMultiple Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID42210196
PMCPMC13227849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.