ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
The role of objective testing in urban adolescents with asthma symptoms in an African centre.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUrban African adolescents suffer from undiagnosed and uncontrolled asthma symptoms. The purpose of this pilot study was to identify factors related to poorly controlled asthma symptoms and evaluate whether the objective measures suggested by the European Respiratory Society task force (ERS-TF) diagnostic algorithm for children assisted with asthma diagnosis.
methodsBetween July 2019 and November 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional cohort study of urban school-going adolescents between 12 and 14 years as part of the Achieving Control of Asthma in Children in Africa (ACACIA) project. The study comprised two stages; (a) screening for asthma symptoms and diagnosis and (b) asthma control test (ACT), pre and post-bronchodilator spirometry, and FeNO measurements in those who were screen-positive.
resultsOf 2093 adolescents screened, 180 were included, and 56% were female. Most participants had severe asthma symptoms (n = 128; 71%) and uncontrolled asthma (n = 157; 87%). Half (n = 90) had a previous asthma diagnosis, and were more likely to have uncontrolled asthma, p = 0.04. A significantly higher number of adolescents with uncontrolled asthma were exposed to traffic near their home (58% vs. 35%, p value < 0.01). Those who were exposed to kerosene lamps and insect sprays were more likely to have airway inflammation; p = 0.02 and p = 0.01; respectively. The prevalence of abnormal spirometry and bronchodilator response (BDR) was 12%. By performing the BDR test in those with normal spirometry, we increased the diagnostic yield of the ERS-TF algorithm by 50%.
conclusionIn this at-risk population, asthma symptoms are common, uncontrolled and related to environmental factors. In over half of those who undergo screening procedures such as spirometry, BDR and FeNO, the likelihood of a diagnosis remains low. Additional research involving non symptomatic control groups and longitudinal assessment is required to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.