ArticleBMC public health2026
Well-care visit attendance among children of adolescent mothers in South Africa: a theory-informed mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWHO recommend that children and adolescents attend scheduled well-care visits for health promotion, prevention, early detection, identification and management of disability and disease. Children born to adolescent mothers experience a disproportionate burden of poor health outcomes, but their well-care attendance is under-researched.
methodsCross-sectional data were used from a cohort of adolescent and young mothers (10–24 years; n = 1040) and their children (n = 1145) recruited through purposive, convenience-based sampling across healthcare facilities and community-based settings in Eastern Cape, South Africa (2017–2019). Quantitative data on visit attendance up to 18 months were analysed using descriptive statistics for children of adolescent mothers (10–19 years) aged ≥ 19 months at data collection, to allow complete observation of visits. In 2022, semi-structured interviews (n = 16) were conducted until saturation, to explore factors influencing attendance. Themes were developed and matched to the capability, opportunity and motivation model of behaviour (COM-B) and Theoretical Domains Framework using a realist thematic template analysis approach.
resultsRecords were available for 415/482 eligible children. Attendance declined from 85.1% (95%CI: 81.3–88.4) at 6 weeks to 49.7% (95%CI: 46.6–56.5%) at 18 months, with higher attendance during visits coinciding with the childhood immunisation schedule. Attendance and qualitative findings were similar by maternal HIV status. Themes were matched to the COM-B. Capability: mothers’ organisational and financial acumen facilitated their child’s attendance; mothers persisted in attending despite harsh attitudes from healthcare workers. Opportunity: financial and kinship support and information in the child health booklet facilitated visit attendance; lack of childcare support, poor weather, cost and distance to clinic interfered with attendance. Motivation: mothers were motivated to attend visits to gain knowledge and fulfil their parental role.
conclusionThis study identified missed opportunities for promoting life-course health and well-being among children and their adolescent mothers, and theory-informed opportunities to support well-care visit attendance. Findings challenge deficit-based narratives highlighting mothers’ motivations and strategies for ensuring attendance. Enhancing the quality of nurse-adolescent mother interactions may increase the perceived and actual value of visits and support attendance. Further research is needed on interventions to promote consistent attendance, address barriers to access and identify opportunities to strengthen integration of well-care and HIV-related services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.