ArticleBMC public health2026
Unemployment and sickness allowance onset and prevalence: a longitudinal register-based study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough unemployed people generally have poorer health than those who are employed, they are not more likely to receive sickness allowance. When they do, benefit periods tend to be longer, suggesting that non-take-up of sickness allowance may be more common among the unemployed. We examined how unemployment is associated with the onset and prevalence of sickness allowance.
methodsWe used longitudinal register data on employed and unemployed residents aged 25-62 years in Finland during 2022-2023 (N = 1,774,257). We estimated random-effects (RE) and fixed-effects (FE) linear probability models and conditional FE logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes of sickness allowance onset and prevalence, and FE Poisson regression for the total number of sickness allowance days.
resultsAmong women, the probability of sickness allowance onset was slightly lower among the unemployed than among the employed (- 1.0 percentage points, 95% CI - 1.0 to - 0.9), In within-individual analyses, transitioning into unemployment was associated with a larger reduction (- 2.3 percentage points, 95% CI - 2.4 to - 2.1). Associations among men were similar but weaker. For sickness allowance prevalence among women, the probability of receiving sickness allowance was higher among the unemployed than among the employed (1.3 percentage points, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5), whereas within-individual analyses indicated no clear change (- 0.2 percentage points, 95% CI - 0.5 to 0.1). However, the within-individual Poisson model showed that the total number of sickness allowance days was higher during unemployment (IRR 2.08, 95% CI 1.96 to 2.21). Results for men were broadly similar, although the within-individual models indicated a small reduction in the likelihood of receiving sickness allowance (- 0.5 percentage points, 95% CI - 0.7 to - 0.3).
conclusionsUnemployment is associated with the lower likelihood of entering sickness allowance, while its association with overall prevalence is weak. At the same time, unemployment is linked to a greater accumulation of sickness allowance days. These findings may reflect underutilization of sickness allowance among unemployed people. Reducing barriers to accessing sickness allowance for unemployed people would help to better identify work incapacity and ensure that those in need receive appropriate support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.