ArticleBMC public health2026
Reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing behaviour among dental practitioners in a south Indian City through an educational intervention- a mixed methods feasibility study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate prescribing of antibiotics by dental practitioners in India is largely attributed to the absence of clinical guidelines and antimicrobial stewardship resources. To help address this, a stewardship intervention for dental practitioners, comprising a chairside antibiotic guide, a training module focusing on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and appropriate dental antibiotic prescribing and a patient information sheet, was co-developed by the authors and stakeholders from India. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention in a primary care setting in a city in southern India, using mixed methods.
methodsThirty-two dentists from Chennai participated in the self-paced training on their laptops simulating online continuing professional development (CPD) training. The mixed-methods pragmatic research involved quantitative pre- and post-test scores, and sixteen qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted after 6 weeks evaluating dentists' experiences of the training and its subsequent implementation in clinical practice. These were analysed descriptively and using thematic framework analysis.
findingsParticipants showed significant improvement in pre-/post- scores from 6.53 (SD ± 3.9) to 15.9 (SD ± 2.7) with a mean difference of 9.4 [95% CI (10.68, 8.13)] after the training (p < 0.001). The intervention was acceptable to dental practitioners who reported increased understanding of AMR and willingness to change inappropriate prescribing behaviour. Concerns remained about pressure from visiting consultants, fear of consequences, changing established norms and record keeping practices.
conclusionsThe intervention was acceptable to participant dentists who were willing to change inappropriate prescribing behaviour. Scale-up of the training in collaboration with stakeholders including the Indian Dental Association and National Dental Commission has the potential to significantly reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in dentistry. The findings are likely to be relevant, with adaptation, to other low- and middle- income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.