ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Understanding door-to-needle delays in acute ischemic stroke: a workflow-based analysis of emergency department care processes.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDoor-to-needle (DTN) performance in acute ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated using aggregate treatment times or isolated predictors. These approaches may not fully capture how delays occur across sequential emergency department processes. Evidence describing the interaction between upstream activation and downstream workflow intervals in secondary-level settings remains limited.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults receiving intravenous thrombolysis at a secondary-level hospital. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify upstream factors associated with delayed DTN (> 60 min). Interval-level decomposition and stratified quantile regression analyses were performed to examine where time differences occurred within the in-hospital pathway and to assess results according to prehospital stroke alert status.
resultsAmong 245 patients, 30.60% had DTN times exceeding 60 min, although the overall median DTN was 50 min (IQR 40-63). Absence of prehospital stroke alert, triage misclassification, and fluctuating neurological presentation were independently associated with delayed treatment. The largest median time differences were observed during coagulation processing, final test-to-needle intervals, and patient or family decision-making. In stratified analyses, final test-to-needle and decision intervals remained prolonged in delayed cases across both alert strata, whereas coagulation delay was significant only in the alert-positive group.
conclusionsDelayed DTN was associated with both upstream activation factors and downstream workflow intervals. Combining determinant modeling with interval-level analysis provides a structured approach to identify operational intervals for evaluation in secondary-level stroke systems.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.