ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2026
Executive function and implications for the Preterm Behavioral Phenotype in very preterm children at age 9-10 years.
Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Memory, attention, and executive function in intellectual and developmental disabilities.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren born very preterm (VPT) have greater executive function (EF) challenges and internalizing, inattention, and social communication-interaction differences (the Preterm Behavioral Phenotype [PBP]) than full-term (FT) children. EF and PBP outcomes for VPT children with white matter injury (WMI) are less well understood. Furthermore, the extent that EF challenges serve as a neurocognitive mechanism for the PBP is unknown.
methodsAs part of a longitudinal study, 123 VPT infants (≤ 30 weeks gestation) were recruited from a level-III neonatal intensive care unit and underwent developmental follow-up at ages 5 and 9-10 years. Forty-four VPT infants had high-grade WMI. Seventy-nine FT control children were also included. At the 5 and 9-10 year follow-up, children completed EF tasks tapping short-term/working memory, inhibitory control, and flexibility/shifting, which were combined into an EF composite at each timepoint. Parents and children also completed measures assessing children's attention-deficit/ hyperactivity, internalizing/anxiety, and social communication-interaction outcomes to generate parent- and child-informant PBP composites at age 9-10 years. Serial mediation analysis examined EF at ages 5 and 9-10 years as serial mediators linking VPT birth and WMI with the PBP, adjusted for covariate factors.
resultsVPT and WMI children demonstrated lower EF abilities at both timepoints compared to FT children (p≤.02). VPT and WMI children obtained higher child-informant PBP composite scores (p<.001) as well as parent- and child-informant social communication-interaction and ADHD-inattentive problem ratings (p≤.03) at age 9-10 years. Lower EF at both timepoints correlated with higher parent- and child-informant PBP ratings (r -0.2 to -0.45, p<.05). Serial mediation analysis showed that EF development from age 5 to 9-10 years (proportion mediated 3-5%) as well as EF at age 9-10 years (proportion mediated 16-43%) partially mediated associations linking VPT birth and WMI with PBP outcomes.
conclusionsVPT and WMI children had greater EF and PBP challenges compared to FT children, with WMI children at greatest risk. Disrupted EF development, at least in part, contributed to the PBP. Findings suggest that VPT and WMI children are in need of early and ongoing EF supports, and that EF training interventions may improve mental health outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.