Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210085›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2026

Interindividual differences in acidogenic potential of the salivary microbiome after mouthwash exposure.

Fabian Mermans, Britt Poelman, Mehraveh Saghi, Wim Teughels, Nico Boon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabian MermansCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, Gent, B-9052, Belgium.
Britt PoelmanCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, Gent, B-9052, Belgium.
Mehraveh SaghiDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry (Periodontology), University Hospitals Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Wim TeughelsDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry (Periodontology), University Hospitals Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
Nico BoonCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, Gent, B-9052, Belgium. Nico.Boon@UGent.be.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0B2719N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoride mouthwashes are commonly used for prevention of dental caries. The most common forms of fluoride are stannous fluoride (SnF

methodsWe compared the effect of fluoride-containing mouthwashes, Elmex Anti Caries (AmF/NaF), Listerine Anti Caries (NaF) and Meridol (AmF/SnF

resultsWe observed mouthwash- and donor-dependent changes in the salivary microbiome composition and acidogenic potential. Meridol affected more bacterial taxa and showed the strongest reduction in organic acids, followed by Elmex. The response to treatment could be captured in the flow cytometric fingerprint of the initial intact salivary microbiota and a random forest classifier predicting the optimal mouthwash for each donor was successfully trained (MCC = 0.95).

conclusionsTreatment with fluoride mouthwashes induces a shift in the salivary microbiome in vitro and alter its potential to produce organic acids, contributing to the prevention of dental caries. Moreover, flow cytometry shows promise for tailoring treatments to patients.

Indexed as

AcidsBacteriaMicrobiotaMouthwashesSalivaAminesDental CariesDrug CombinationsFlow CytometryFluoride TreatmentHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalicylatesSodium FluorideTerpenesTin FluoridesAcidsAminesDrug CombinationsListerineMeridolMouthwashesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalicylatesSodium FluorideTerpenesTin FluoridesCell sortingFACSFluorideOral microbiomeOrganic acidsPrecision medicineSaliva

Identifiers

PMID42210085
PMCPMC13393925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.