ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Predicting growth, water-use efficiency and drought response through machine learning, GWAS and differential expression in Ponderosa pine.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the molecular basis of phenotypic trait variation is key in improving field performance in plants. Many plants have high within seed source phenotypic variation, making trait-based inferences for performance difficult and inaccurate. Our study combined machine learning methods along with genomics and transcriptomics to understand the molecular drivers of important seedling traits in ponderosa pine. We measured height, specific leaf area, biomass related traits, d13C, d15N, percent carbon, percent nitrogen in well-watered and drought conditions using species' range-wide seed sources. Seedlings from California's seed sources were the fastest growing, while the ones from Montana and Wyoming were the slowest. Despite differences in growth, common responses to drought were seen across all regions. Needles per bundle was shown to be an extremely useful trait to screen for growth strategies of a seed source. We identified one to 36 unique genes (2-209 SNPs) per trait that provided accurate predictions for most traits (2-37% mean absolute percent error). We show that prediction accuracy is trait dependent, mostly higher for traits with high heritability and lower in traits sensitive to environmental change. Drought-stressed seed sources from contrasting elevations showed differential expression of phenylpropanoids, terpenoids and carotenoids genes. Our predictive models show promise for future studies to predict phenotypes upon germination instead of waiting several years to measure specific traits. This will allow for a faster, more accurate selection of best suited individuals and seed sources for any site, resulting in more efficient and successful outplanting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.