ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Radiology appointment management in German hospitals: a survey of referring physicians.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesReferring physicians' experiences with imaging coordination remain underexplored. This study compares imaging coordination experiences between general practitioners (GPs) as outpatient referrers and hospital-based physicians as inpatient referrers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in Germany (June 2023-June 2024), including 220 physicians in the final analytical cohort (79 GPs, 141 hospital-based physicians).
resultsGPs had significantly more professional experience than hospital-based physicians (20 ± 14 vs. 7 ± 9 years; p < 0.001), with no gender differences (p = 0.71). GPs rated the impact of imaging delays on patient care (4.4 ± 1.5) and coordination challenges with radiology services (4.6 ± 1.4) significantly above the neutral midpoint of 4.0 (whereas hospital-based physicians did so only for coordination challenges. Hospital-based physicians preferred real-time workflow tracking (34.8% vs. 9.0%; p < 0.001) and automated reminders of radiological appointments (20.6% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.006), whereas GPs favored centralized scheduling (33.3% vs. 19.2%; p = 0.02) and urgent case prioritization (42.3% vs. 23.4%; p = 0.005). Short-term appointment availability was the highest-ranked priority among the five evaluated categories by referring physicians, accounting for 25.0% of weighted rankings (p < 0.001).
conclusionsScheduling delays remain a major barrier to timely diagnostics and reflect multifactorial system constraints. Referrer-specific appointment strategies may improve coordination across outpatient and inpatient settings. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This survey identifies barriers to radiology appointment scheduling among outpatient and inpatient referrers in German hospital radiology departments, providing a basis for targeted strategies to reduce imaging delays. KEY POINTS: Short-term availability ranks highest priority across groups of referrers. GPs reported higher perceived impact of imaging delays on patient care than hospital doctors. Referrer preferences vary: GPs favor centralized scheduling. Hospital-based physicians prefer real-time workflow tracking. Referrer-specific interventions may improve perceived reliability of imaging coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.