SynthesisEndocrine2026
Female sexual dysfunction in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFemale sexual dysfunction (FSD) in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an under-appreciated complication. Despite its profound impact on female health, including reduced quality of life and psychological distress, it remains underrepresented in major diabetes guidelines. Current data synthesis is limited, often excluding older populations or failing to compare diabetes subtypes. We aimed to collate the prevalence of FSD in T1DM, pool the risk of FSD in T1DM compared to controls, compare the risk in T1DM vs. T2DM and to investigate the impact of different variables on these effects.
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to identify cross-sectional/cohort studies including T1DM participants. Proportion of women with FSD in T1DM versus age-matched control/T2DM population (if reported), and population characteristics were extracted.
resultsThe pooled analysis of 18 studies (N = 2476) indicated FSD prevalence of 37% in adults with T1DM (95% CI: 30%, 43%; I
conclusionsFSD is prevalent in approximately one-third of women with T1DM, with a higher risk compared to those with T2DM, likely due to earlier onset and longer diabetes duration. Comprehensive care strategies that address both the physiological and psychological aspects of T1DM are warranted to improve sexual health and overall well-being in affected women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42209931What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.