ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Initial clinical experience with RADA16 as a novel therapeutic for severe haemorrhagic radiation cystitis: a preliminary feasibility case series.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaemorrhagic radiation cystitis (HRC) is a challenging complication of pelvic radiotherapy, often resistant to conventional treatments.
aimsTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of RADA16, a self-assembling peptide, in managing severe HRC.
methodsA preliminary feasibility case series of five consecutive patients treated at two UK hospitals. All patients had persistent haematuria despite standard interventions and received RADA16 via flexible or rigid cystoscopy.
resultsThe findings from the cases suggest that all patients have experienced at least a partial or early resolution of haematuria and no adverse effects were reported. In most cases, two applications of RADA16 were sufficient. The longest patient followed up was still symptom free at 3 years. DISCUSSION: This preliminary feasibility case series has demonstrated early efficacy for RADA16 in the management of HRC.
conclusionsRADA16 is a potentially promising minimally invasive treatment for refractory HRC. Further trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42209908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.