ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Please follow the rules: surgical workflow recognition constrained by linear temporal logic.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSurgical workflow recognition aims at automatically recognizing the actions performed during a surgery. Deep learning methods showed their capacity to recognize these actions, but with heavy reliance on training data only, which can sometimes lead to unrealistic predictions. Using procedural knowledge in the form of logic-based rules during model training can help improve temporal consistency and robustness, and also provides a structured way to inspect model outputs.
methodIn this paper, we used differentiable temporal logic (DTL) to define procedural constraints on the action classes of different surgeries, and used them during training to help the network follow these constraints. We also propose 2 new operators taken from Allen's Interval Algebra (AIA) to define more fine-grained and interpretable constraint types and their corresponding evaluation functions. The methods were evaluated using accuracy and segment-based metrics like Edit score and segmental F1-score on 3 different datasets: an in-house dataset of robotic-assisted hysterectomies and 2 other public datasets, namely AutoLaparo and Cholec80. In addition we implemented and compared 3 different types of temporal models: Bi-LSTMs , MS-TCNs, and a transformer-based model (ASFormer).
resultsBoth DTL and AIA constraints had a moderate impact on accuracy when observed, but show a trend toward an increase in the segment-based metrics, indicating a higher temporal consistency of the predictions across different datasets and temporal modeling strategies. Statistical testing reveals significant differences in some conditions.
conclusionLogic formulas are an effective way of defining procedural constraints on actions, and their use can help during training to obtain temporally consistent predictions, and may support future work on explainability for surgical AI systems. While improvements in frame-wise accuracy remain modest, the results indicate that integrating procedural knowledge can meaningfully influence sequence-level predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42209907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.