Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42209905›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Simulation-Calibrated Control of Type I Error Rate in One-Trial Approach with Dose Optimization in Oncology Drug Development.

Zhao Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhao YangBicara Therapeutics Inc, 116 Huntington Avenue Suite 703, Boston, MA, 02116, USA. tonyyangsxz@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The one-trial approach [8] has emerged as a pivotal strategy for streamlining oncology drug development by allowing a single study to support both accelerated approval (AA) and regular approval (RA). The integrating Dose Optimization with One-Trial Approach (iDOOTA) framework extends this paradigm by enabling a single randomized study to both identify an optimal biological dose (OBD) and provide confirmatory evidence on short- and long-term clinical outcomes, such as ORR and OS. In this paper, we propose a simulation-based calibration strategy to control the type I error rate induced by dose selection within the iDOOTA framework. A numerical case study is presented to illustrate the key features and practical implementation of the proposed method. In addition, several operational considerations relevant to the iDOOTA framework are discussed. As with all innovative regulatory strategies, it is advisable to seek FDA agreement during the study design phase to ensure alignment and facilitate subsequent regulatory review.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DevelopmentCalibrationComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ApprovalHumansResearch DesignAntineoplastic AgentsAccelerated approvalDose optimizationOncology drug developmentOne-trial approachRegular approvalType I error rate

Identifiers

PMID42209905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.